Video Spotlight
Agile Sponsors
Upcoming and Recent WebCasts
|
Agile teams do a good job of articulating their overall goals. They must:
These goals really have nothing to do with the things that traditional project managers focus on, such as estimates, status, overruns, and deliverables. In particular, the focus on delivering value to the business (in the form of working software) is the single biggest difference. Traditional project management processes won't address Agile teams' needs. Whether managers choose to adjust traditional processes or adopt new Agile management techniques, change is essential.
Prioritizing requirements based on business value. This seems so obvious, yet few teams really do it. Short, time-boxed iterations force teams to revisit scope on a regular basis. Implementing customer-driven requirements prioritization not only leads to shorter "time to benefits" but also to stronger customer relationships. I worked with a large consumer products company that adopted Scrum on a number of IT projects. Even after 18 months of experience, team members were amazed at the results. Their business customers were "so happy" with the features delivered in the first few iterations of a project, that they "settled" for that and never asked for all of the requirements to be implemented.
Implementing true test-driven development. Test early and often is a common IT mantra, yet again we see Agile teams truly reaping the benefits. TDD provides the ability not only to find early errors, but also to adapt designs and refactor earlier solutions to better meet requirements. So TDD leads to better design, and is not just about testing.
For Agile processes to truly scale to the enterprise and succeed on globally distributed projects, companies must take a top-down approach to Agile project management. Expect to see industry leaders and tool vendors address these challenges head-on in 2007. [1] See "Agile, Top Down." http://www.xprogramming.com/xpmag/AgileTopDown.htm [2] The APLN (http://www.apln.org/) is distinct from the Agile Alliance (http://www.agilealliance.org/), but shares many members and works towards complementary goals. Also see the Declaration of Interdependence (http://www.pmdoi.org/) for more details on its overall goals.
[3] See "When Failure Is Not an Option," CIO Magazine, June 1, 2006. http://www.cio.com/archive/060106/ag_edwards.html About the Author Liz Barnett is the Editor in Chief of the Agile Journal and Principal Analyst at EZ Insight Inc. Previously Liz spent 10 years as a Vice President and Research Analyst at Forrester Research, joining Forrester as a result of its acquisition of Giga Information Group. Liz held management positions at Accenture, PepsiCo, and Atelier Research. She also was the Research Director for the advanced software development and advanced network computing research services at New Science Associates, prior to its acquisition by Gartner Group. Liz holds a patent for developing a distributed application development/CASE tool. Liz earned her B.S. in operations research and industrial engineering at Cornell University. {mos_sb_discuss:8}
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 13449 Comments (0)
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Agile Marketplace - Announcements and Special Offers
White Paper: Code Review IS an Agile Process!
Peer code review is one of the most effective ways to improve Software Quality – but is it Agile? Done correctly, it absolutely is. This white paper tells you how.
Download Today!
Virtual Conference: Collabnet Agile ALM
Stay current by attending CollabNet’s virtual conference, Agile ALM for Distributed Development, Thursday, April 15, from 7:30 am to 3:30 pm PDT. Free registration.
Register Today!
Webcast: Moving Build and Code Quality Upstream
This interactive panel discussion moderated by Bob Aiello, Editor-in-Chief fo the CM Journal brings industry experts Anders Wallgren, CTO of Electric Cloud and Gwyn Fisher, CTO of Klocwork together for a candid discussion of the cost savings, productivity and quality benefits that can be achieved by stabilizing builds and code quality as early in the development cycle as possible.
Register Now!
Collabnet -TeamForge 5.3
CollabNet TeamForge 5.3 includes Dynamic Planning—providing flexibility to model release scope and timeline in a single view. Now, you can easily manipulate/adjust release data.
Download Your Free Trial
Requirements-based testing (RBT) can help to ensure comprehensive test coverage, reducing the risk of failure and improving software quality. This white paper details how application lifecycle management can be used to more effectively implement RBT processes, offering greater collaboration, traceability and control.can help you increase efficiency, reduce project risk, and improve overall software quality. Learn how MKS Integrity for application lifecycle management enables RBT, delivering full lifecycle traceability to help ensure that project requirements have complete test planning and execution coverage.
Download the Requirements-Based Testing whitepaper
PureCM –SCM for Agile Teams
PureCM helps you to manage development in short iterations: keeping track of changes, supporting automated builds and preserving frequent snapshots of your projects.
Get the free trial now


When projects fail, regardless of the methodology, project management gets the blame. Developers can write great code, QA staff can find bugs (albeit some more quickly than others), and subsequent iterations can address any gaps or misinterpretations of customer requirements. But since the project managers are visible to the business staff and have overall responsibility for delivering the project, they take the heat. Even though Agile projects emphasize self-organizing teams and tight IT/customer collaboration, they're not immune. Organizations must learn how to manage Agile projects - a pretty big challenge since most do a lousy job of managing more traditional IT projects!
