I'll be presenting at Agile2009 in Chicago on the Tools for Agility stage on Tuesday 25 August, 4:45pm-5:30pm.
Here is my session description from http://agile2009.org/node/2762
WANTED: Seeking Single Agile Knowledge Development Tool-set Aren’t code, backlog-items, tests, designs & documents all just different forms of system knowledge at different levels of detail? Why can’t the same tools help refactor, browse, search, and provide build/test automation for non-code forms of knowledge without requiring a separate tool/repository for each format? Thi[...] |
This question came-up in a discussion earlier this week: Do we know of published studies on this subject? A quick Google-search turned up the following for me ...
|
I found a really good resource-list from George Dinwiddie on Introspection and Retrospectives that includes the following list of resources (mostly patterns & techniques) about conducting retrospectives. It contains many (but not all) of the links below:
|
In my previous post, Refactoring for Agility, I posted an outline and some thoughts for Part I of an Overview on Refactoring. Now I'm ready to post on Part II which is about refactoring @ scale. By "at scale" I mean in the larger context of other agile practices, as well as for large projects.
PART II - REFACTORING @ SCALE
1. Scaling-Up
- To scale refactoring for larger projects, some additional techniques & issues must be added to the mix.
- Note that this is “in addition to” (not “instead of”)
| Refactoring In-the-Small | Refactoring @ Scale | | Small, Fast & Frequent Refactorings | Larger, Periodic & Planned Restructurings | | Emergent Design | Incremental Design & Evolutionary Architecture | | Deferred Ref[...] |
Some of you might have guessed from my recent posts on Emergent Design, Technical Debt, JEDI Programming, and 5S Qualities of Well Designed, Well-Factored Code, that I've been looking into trying to teach the fundamentals of refactoring and how it scales to larger projects. I've gathered some references and quotes and some ideas for slides that I wanted to bounce around on my blog.
Here is an outline and some thoughts for part I of some slides ...
PART I - REFACTORING FOR AGILITY
1. Overview of Refactoring
|
Three more brand new books I just received that are worth mentioning ...
For those who may not know ...
|
In the July issue of the Agile Journal I reviewed Walker Royce, Kurt Bittner and Mike Perrow's book The Economics of Iterative Software Development: Steering Toward Better Business Results. Here is an excerpt ...
The Economics of Iterative Software Development: Steering Toward Better Business Results is an important text for anyone trying to persuade management to "go iterative" as well as to anyone needing to measure & track the kinds of business results that management needs to see for a software development project.
I'll be perfectly honest: I was expecting this book to be an extremely dry and boring read, albeit full of lots of useful information densely packed in mathematical models and formulas, perhaps reminiscent of past college days reading a huge tome on socio-political economic theories. It wasn't as bad as I'd feared. Yes - it [...] |
I left a comment on the "What is Missing?" entry at the Agile-in-a-Flash blog. The author's asked the questioin "What is missing?" from the stack of Agile flashcards they are developing. I responded ...
I think the "JEDI" approach is missing (any by that, I don't mean the mantra of "use the source Luke" ;-)
I think there is something missing regarding TDD and Design. Uncle Bob's three rules of TDD (and other writings) often mislead people to think that there is ZERO design up-front, as is if NOT doing Big-Design-Up-Front (BDUF) implies that therefore there is zero up-front design (NoDUF).
This is false (and Uncle Bob has even vehemently said so in
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |
Agile Marketplace - Announcements and Special Offers
Webcast: Moving Build and Code Quality Upstream This interactive panel discussion moderated by Bob Aiello, Editor-in-Chief fo the CM Journal brings industry experts Anders Wallgren, CTO of Electric Cloud and Gwyn Fisher, CTO of Klocwork together for a candid discussion of the cost savings, productivity and quality benefits that can be achieved by stabilizing builds and code quality as early in the development cycle as possible. Register Now!
Collabnet -TeamForge 5.3 CollabNet TeamForge 5.3 includes Dynamic Planning—providing flexibility to model release scope and timeline in a single view. Now, you can easily manipulate/adjust release data. Download Your Free Trial
Requirements-based testing (RBT) can help to ensure comprehensive test coverage, reducing the risk of failure and improving software quality. This white paper details how application lifecycle management can be used to more effectively implement RBT processes, offering greater collaboration, traceability and control.can help you increase efficiency, reduce project risk, and improve overall software quality. Learn how MKS Integrity for application lifecycle management enables RBT, delivering full lifecycle traceability to help ensure that project requirements have complete test planning and execution coverage. Download the Requirements-Based Testing whitepaper
PureCM –SCM for Agile Teams PureCM helps you to manage development in short iterations: keeping track of changes, supporting automated builds and preserving frequent snapshots of your projects. Get the free trial now
|