We have 5946 guests and 11 members online

Agile Sponsors

HP

CollabNet

TechWell

Home > Blogs > Featured Blogs > Plan and Deliver > A Wiki is a Poor Substitue for Microsoft SharePoint

A Wiki is a Poor Substitue for Microsoft SharePoint
Written by Peter Schuh   
Monday, 23 March 2009 13:18

Please read the next four sentences before letting the dogs loose on me.

I love wikis. Really. And I am not a SharePoint fan. Really.

Now, I only need four more paragraphs to explain.

First, a wiki is supposed to help us make information maintainable. One way we do this is by centralizing and restricting topics to one per page. In order to review and revise a topic in its entirety, all one needs to do is edit the topic page. All the links into the page automatically send readers to the latest revisions.

Second, a wiki is meant to make information more accessible. Topics can be linked to directly, from both within and outside the wiki. By linking to referenced topics at every opportunity, we allow the reader to enter into the conversation at any level of granularity. The reader can then follow links across topics to gather the necessary background information and focus on his or her particular area of interest.

Third, a wiki is an evolving conversation. Pages are created and revised by numerous authors to reflect the current understanding of and thoughts around a given topic. Many pages never, truly, leave a draft status. The goal is not to collectively polish. The goal is to communicate in a collaborative, efficient and effective manner.

Fourth, a wiki is NOT a forum where: (1) each page is a document instead of a topic, (2) the pages rarely link to one another, and (3) each page carries enough information to be consumed outside of the context of wiki itself.  If your wiki looks like this, then what you’ve constructed is a poor-man’s SharePoint (a wiki anti-practice). And your SharePoint wiki is not likely to thrive, since it has none of the benefits of a wiki (maintainability, accessability, consersational tone) and all of the drawbacks (clunky editing, clunky formatting, clunky or nonexistant permissions). If you want a navigatable hierarchy of polished, stand alone pages that do not converse with one another then you’d be better off using SharePoint and Microsoft Word (or open-source alternatives).

A Wiki is a Poor Substitue for Microsoft SharePoint

Read Full Article
Author:Peter Schuh

Trackback(0)

Comments (1)Add Comment

Var
...
written by Var, July 09, 2010
So what are the open-source alternatives you reference.
I need exactly this for my community association BoD.

Write comment

feedShow/hide comment form

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Cialis

Agile Marketplace - Announcements and Special Offers

Upcoming Webcasts
Sponsored by Urbancode - On Demand
Mastering Complex Application Deployment
Sponsored by CollabNet - Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Closing the Agile Loop: Continuous Integration, Continuous Information

ScrumWorks Pro – The World’s Best Agile Project Management Tool
Simply put, CollabNet’s ScrumWorks Pro is the best Agile project management solution on the market, bar none. More than 150,000 Agile professionals rely on the power and simplicity of ScrumWorks every day.  But don’t take our word for it – try it yourself for free. CollabNet is now providing the first 10 users of ScrumWorks Pro at no charge!
Download ScrumWorks Pro today!

The Business Case for ALM Transformation
Are legacy systems holding your company back?  Breakthrough these technical constraints with an open and scalable environment that meets your unique business need to transform. There is no reason to be locked into an obsolete platform. The output of a number of recent transitions from legacy systems, this is practical white paper shares lessons learned and illustrates how guidance and enablement can pave the way for change.
Download this Whitepaper